Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.432 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
0.389 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
109th
Pakistan rank
111th

Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Pakistan
00.20.40.60.8197019962023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.432 million USD per square kilometre against 0.389 million USD per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.043 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Pakistan ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 109th and Pakistan ranks 111th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre 0.0203 million USD per square kilometre 0.0192 million USD per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.0519 million USD per square kilometre 0.0485 million USD per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 0.0128 million USD per square kilometre 0.0939 million USD per square kilometre 0.0811 million USD per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 0.2938 million USD per square kilometre 0.1793 million USD per square kilometre 0.1146 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.5877 million USD per square kilometre 0.3559 million USD per square kilometre 0.2318 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.4253 million USD per square kilometre 0.4092 million USD per square kilometre 0.0161 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product — value us$, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Pakistan?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.432 million USD per square kilometre against 0.389 million USD per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product — value us$, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan?
0.043 million USD per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan rank globally for gross domestic product — value us$, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 109th and Pakistan ranks 111th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/pakistan/">Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Domestic Product — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.