Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Sudan: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, annual growth rate

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
35.14 % change on previous year
in 2024
South Sudan
180.38 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
3rd
South Sudan rank
1st

Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, annual growth rate over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • South Sudan
-50050100150200197119972024

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 180.38 % change on previous year against 35.14 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 145.24 % change on previous year.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 5.1 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 1st of 30 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 2 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s -2.95 % change on previous year -19.81 % change on previous year 16.85 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 6.02 % change on previous year -2.15 % change on previous year 8.17 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 13.65 % change on previous year 37.62 % change on previous year 23.97 % change on previous year South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product — value us$, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 180.38 % change on previous year against 35.14 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross domestic product — value us$, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Sudan?
145.24 % change on previous year, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Sudan?
16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Sudan rank globally for gross domestic product — value us$, annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 1st of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Sudan: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-sudan/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Sudan: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
266 places, 13,305 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Gross Domestic Product — Value US$. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.