Guinea-Bissau vs Zambia: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
0.054 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0366 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
171st
Zambia rank
174th

Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zambia
0.010.020.030.040.05197019962023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.054 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0366 million USD per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0174 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.5 times Zambia's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 171st and Zambia ranks 174th of 194 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0158 million USD per square kilometre 0.008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0078 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.017 million USD per square kilometre 0.0085 million USD per square kilometre 0.0085 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.0232 million USD per square kilometre 0.0093 million USD per square kilometre 0.0138 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0269 million USD per square kilometre 0.0144 million USD per square kilometre 0.0124 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0377 million USD per square kilometre 0.0273 million USD per square kilometre 0.0104 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.0501 million USD per square kilometre 0.0336 million USD per square kilometre 0.0165 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Zambia?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.054 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0366 million USD per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Zambia?
0.0174 million USD per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zambia rank globally for gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 171st and Zambia ranks 174th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Zambia: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zambia/">Guinea-Bissau vs Zambia: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.