Guatemala vs New Zealand: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre

Guatemala
0.7562 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.8446 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
80th
New Zealand rank
77th

Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • New Zealand
0.20.40.60.8197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.8446 million USD per square kilometre against 0.7562 million USD per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0884 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 80th and New Zealand ranks 77th of 194 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1611 million USD per square kilometre 0.2622 million USD per square kilometre 0.1011 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.2078 million USD per square kilometre 0.3094 million USD per square kilometre 0.1016 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.279 million USD per square kilometre 0.3738 million USD per square kilometre 0.0947 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.4035 million USD per square kilometre 0.5247 million USD per square kilometre 0.1212 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.5672 million USD per square kilometre 0.6722 million USD per square kilometre 0.105 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.7091 million USD per square kilometre 0.82 million USD per square kilometre 0.1109 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre, Guatemala or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.8446 million USD per square kilometre against 0.7562 million USD per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre between Guatemala and New Zealand?
0.0884 million USD per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and New Zealand rank globally for gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 80th and New Zealand ranks 77th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs New Zealand: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/new-zealand/">Guatemala vs New Zealand: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.