Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
0.0626 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0598 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
166th
Zimbabwe rank
167th

Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.06197019962023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.0626 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0598 million USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0028 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0066 million USD per square kilometre 0.0148 million USD per square kilometre 0.0082 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0095 million USD per square kilometre 0.0201 million USD per square kilometre 0.0106 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0142 million USD per square kilometre 0.0276 million USD per square kilometre 0.0134 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0246 million USD per square kilometre 0.0236 million USD per square kilometre 0.001 million USD per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 0.0432 million USD per square kilometre 0.0495 million USD per square kilometre 0.0063 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0599 million USD per square kilometre 0.0549 million USD per square kilometre 0.005 million USD per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Burkina Faso, at 0.0626 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0598 million USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
0.0028 million USD per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.