Botswana vs Suriname: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre

Botswana
0.0317 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0281 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
177th
Suriname rank
179th

Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Suriname
00.010.020.03197019962023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0317 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0281 million USD per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0036 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Suriname ahead.

Botswana ranks 177th and Suriname ranks 179th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre 0.0136 million USD per square kilometre 0.0119 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0051 million USD per square kilometre 0.015 million USD per square kilometre 0.0099 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.0119 million USD per square kilometre 0.0161 million USD per square kilometre 0.0042 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0178 million USD per square kilometre 0.0216 million USD per square kilometre 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0244 million USD per square kilometre 0.0313 million USD per square kilometre 0.0069 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.0295 million USD per square kilometre 0.0275 million USD per square kilometre 0.002 million USD per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre, Botswana or Suriname?
Botswana, at 0.0317 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0281 million USD per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre between Botswana and Suriname?
0.0036 million USD per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for gross domestic product — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 177th and Suriname ranks 179th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Suriname: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/">Botswana vs Suriname: Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Domestic Product — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.