Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square

Greenland
0.051 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0785 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
192nd
Zimbabwe rank
190th

Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square over time

  • Greenland
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.060.08197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0785 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.051 million SLC per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 0.0275 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Greenland ranks 192nd and Zimbabwe ranks 190th of 192 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0039 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0117 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0078 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0142 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0258 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0116 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0205 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0297 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0092 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0273 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0202 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0072 million SLC per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 0.0409 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0493 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0084 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.05 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0663 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0162 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product — value standard local currency, per square, Greenland or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0785 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.051 million SLC per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product — value standard local currency, per square between Greenland and Zimbabwe?
0.0275 million SLC per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross domestic product — value standard local currency, per square?
Greenland ranks 192nd and Zimbabwe ranks 190th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/">Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 9,479 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.