Croatia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square

Croatia
1.39 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.48 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia rank
154th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
152nd

Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square over time

  • Croatia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.511.5197019962023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.48 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.39 million SLC per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 0.09 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Croatia ranks 154th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 152nd of 192 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2618 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2181 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0437 million SLC per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 0.6309 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5874 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0435 million SLC per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 0.8484 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9522 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1037 million SLC per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 1.14 million SLC per square kilometre 1.21 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0727 million SLC per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product — value standard local currency, per square, Croatia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.48 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.39 million SLC per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product — value standard local currency, per square between Croatia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.09 million SLC per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gross domestic product — value standard local currency, per square?
Croatia ranks 154th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 152nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/croatia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/croatia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Croatia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 9,479 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.