Malta vs New Caledonia: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices

Malta
51.03 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
50.85 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
52nd
New Caledonia rank
53rd

Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices over time

  • Malta
  • New Caledonia
01020304050197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 51.03 million SLC per square kilometre against 50.85 million SLC per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.18 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Malta ranks 52nd and New Caledonia ranks 53rd of 194 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 4.56 million SLC per square kilometre 16.13 million SLC per square kilometre 11.57 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 8.64 million SLC per square kilometre 17.64 million SLC per square kilometre 9 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 14.33 million SLC per square kilometre 29.29 million SLC per square kilometre 14.95 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 20.67 million SLC per square kilometre 37.73 million SLC per square kilometre 17.06 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 31.53 million SLC per square kilometre 50.36 million SLC per square kilometre 18.83 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 46.31 million SLC per square kilometre 50.4 million SLC per square kilometre 4.09 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product — value standard local currency, 2015 prices, Malta or New Caledonia?
Malta, at 51.03 million SLC per square kilometre against 50.85 million SLC per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product — value standard local currency, 2015 prices between Malta and New Caledonia?
0.18 million SLC per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Caledonia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malta and New Caledonia rank globally for gross domestic product — value standard local currency, 2015 prices?
Malta ranks 52nd and New Caledonia ranks 53rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs New Caledonia: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/malta/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/malta/new-caledonia/">Malta vs New Caledonia: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.