Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices

Greenland
0.0461 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0598 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
191st
Zimbabwe rank
190th

Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices over time

  • Greenland
  • Zimbabwe
0.010.020.030.040.050.06197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0598 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0461 million SLC per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 0.0137 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Greenland ahead.

Greenland ranks 191st and Zimbabwe ranks 190th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0203 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0148 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0055 million SLC per square kilometre Greenland
1980s 0.0292 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0201 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0091 million SLC per square kilometre Greenland
1990s 0.0292 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0276 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0016 million SLC per square kilometre Greenland
2000s 0.0341 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0236 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0105 million SLC per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 0.0418 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0495 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0078 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0453 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0549 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0095 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product — value standard local currency, 2015 prices, Greenland or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0598 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0461 million SLC per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product — value standard local currency, 2015 prices between Greenland and Zimbabwe?
0.0137 million SLC per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross domestic product — value standard local currency, 2015 prices?
Greenland ranks 191st and Zimbabwe ranks 190th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/">Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.