Australia vs Zambia: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices

Australia
0.2585 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.316 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
181st
Zambia rank
178th

Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices over time

  • Australia
  • Zambia
0.10.20.3197019962023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.316 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2585 million SLC per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0575 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Australia ranks 181st and Zambia ranks 178th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0621 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0689 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0068 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0831 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0737 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0094 million SLC per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.1136 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0807 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0329 million SLC per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.1618 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1244 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0374 million SLC per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.2125 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2361 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0236 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.249 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2901 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0411 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product — value standard local currency, 2015 prices, Australia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.316 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2585 million SLC per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product — value standard local currency, 2015 prices between Australia and Zambia?
0.0575 million SLC per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Australia and Zambia rank globally for gross domestic product — value standard local currency, 2015 prices?
Australia ranks 181st and Zambia ranks 178th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Zambia: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/australia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/australia/zambia/">Australia vs Zambia: Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Domestic Product — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.