Lithuania vs Pakistan: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre

Lithuania
1.90 million international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
1.81 million international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
73rd
Pakistan rank
74th

Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre over time

  • Lithuania
  • Pakistan
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 1.90 million international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre against 1.81 million international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 90,690 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 73rd and Pakistan ranks 74th of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 674,145 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 545,412 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 128,733 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 1.01 million international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 927,151 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 87,168 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 1.43 million international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 1.45 million international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 18,875 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 1.83 million international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 1.74 million international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 93,745 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre, Lithuania or Pakistan?
Lithuania, at 1.90 million international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre against 1.81 million international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre between Lithuania and Pakistan?
90,690 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Pakistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Pakistan rank globally for gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 73rd and Pakistan ranks 74th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Pakistan: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-gdp-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-gdp-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/pakistan/">Lithuania vs Pakistan: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre
Unit
international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,758 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic product (GDP) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.