Australia vs Kazakhstan: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre

Australia
221,227 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
258,234 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
152nd
Kazakhstan rank
149th

Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 258,234 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre against 221,227 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 37,007 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Australia ranks 152nd and Kazakhstan ranks 149th of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 90,625 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 47,937 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 42,688 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre Australia
2000s 128,668 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 74,482 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 54,186 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre Australia
2010s 178,455 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 185,770 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 7,315 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 214,881 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 240,083 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre 25,202 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre, Australia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 258,234 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre against 221,227 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre between Australia and Kazakhstan?
37,007 international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for gross domestic product (gdp), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 152nd and Kazakhstan ranks 149th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-gdp-per-square-kilometre/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-product-gdp-per-square-kilometre/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic product (GDP), per square kilometre
Unit
international-$ in 2021 prices per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,758 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic product (GDP) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.