Chad vs Malawi: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Chad
517.09 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Malawi
519.94 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Chad rank
24th
Malawi rank
22nd
Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per unit of GDP over time
- Chad
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 519.94 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 517.09 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Chad, a difference of 2.85 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 24th and Malawi ranks 22nd of 179 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 574.63 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 681.5 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 106.86 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
| 2020s | 540.73 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 593.32 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | 52.59 constant LCU per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross domestic income (constant lcu), per unit of gdp, Chad or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 519.94 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 517.09 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross domestic income (constant lcu), per unit of gdp between Chad and Malawi?
- 2.85 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Malawi?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Malawi rank globally for gross domestic income (constant lcu), per unit of gdp?
- Chad ranks 24th and Malawi ranks 22nd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic income (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.