Iceland vs Madagascar: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Iceland
35.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar
38.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
54th
Madagascar rank
52nd

Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Madagascar
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 38.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 35.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 2.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 54th and Madagascar ranks 52nd of 175 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Madagascar Difference Ahead
1970s 8.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 17.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 13.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre 16.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 16.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 17.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 23.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre 24.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 27.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre 33.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 32.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre 37.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Iceland or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 38.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 35.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Iceland and Madagascar?
2.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Madagascar?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Madagascar rank globally for gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 54th and Madagascar ranks 52nd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Madagascar: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-income-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-income-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/madagascar/">Iceland vs Madagascar: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 7,081 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic income (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.