El Salvador vs New Zealand: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre

El Salvador
1.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
1.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
128th
New Zealand rank
126th

Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • New Zealand
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196519942023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 1.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 45,800 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 128th and New Zealand ranks 126th of 175 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 666,628 constant LCU per square kilometre 408,059 constant LCU per square kilometre 258,569 constant LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 567,523 constant LCU per square kilometre 483,994 constant LCU per square kilometre 83,529 constant LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 772,356 constant LCU per square kilometre 581,977 constant LCU per square kilometre 190,380 constant LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 947,794 constant LCU per square kilometre 826,565 constant LCU per square kilometre 121,230 constant LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 1.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 33,793 constant LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 1.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre 68,138 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre, El Salvador or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 1.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre between El Salvador and New Zealand?
45,800 constant LCU per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and New Zealand rank globally for gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 128th and New Zealand ranks 126th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs New Zealand: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-income-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-income-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/new-zealand/">El Salvador vs New Zealand: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 7,081 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic income (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.