Congo vs Uruguay: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Congo
10.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
10.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
76th
Uruguay rank
77th

Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Uruguay
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 10.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 10.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 189,600 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Congo ranks 76th and Uruguay ranks 77th of 175 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 1.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 2.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 4.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre 318,030 constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
1990s 4.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre 583,853 constant LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 8.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2010s 13.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2020s 10.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre 57,570 constant LCU per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Congo or Uruguay?
Congo, at 10.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 10.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Congo and Uruguay?
189,600 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Uruguay rank globally for gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 76th and Uruguay ranks 77th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Uruguay: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-income-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-income-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/uruguay/">Congo vs Uruguay: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 7,081 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic income (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.