Canada vs Mauritania: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Canada
295,015 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
310,235 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
160th
Mauritania rank
159th

Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Canada
  • Mauritania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 310,235 constant LCU per square kilometre against 295,015 constant LCU per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 15,220 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 160th and Mauritania ranks 159th of 175 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 6 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 55,111 constant LCU per square kilometre 42,442 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,669 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
1970s 85,335 constant LCU per square kilometre 57,772 constant LCU per square kilometre 27,562 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
1980s 115,438 constant LCU per square kilometre 61,840 constant LCU per square kilometre 53,599 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
1990s 142,753 constant LCU per square kilometre 87,832 constant LCU per square kilometre 54,921 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
2000s 198,727 constant LCU per square kilometre 129,721 constant LCU per square kilometre 69,006 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
2010s 241,831 constant LCU per square kilometre 216,772 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,060 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
2020s 278,740 constant LCU per square kilometre 295,924 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,184 constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Canada or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 310,235 constant LCU per square kilometre against 295,015 constant LCU per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Canada and Mauritania?
15,220 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Mauritania rank globally for gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Canada ranks 160th and Mauritania ranks 159th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Mauritania: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-income-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-income-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/mauritania/">Canada vs Mauritania: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 7,081 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic income (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.