Mauritius vs Papua New Guinea: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- Mauritius
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 20.0% against 19.9% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 131st and Papua New Guinea ranks 130th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 30.3% | 21.6% | 8.7% | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 23.4% | 25.2% | 1.8% | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 27.8% | 21.4% | 6.4% | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 23.1% | 21.2% | 1.9% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, Mauritius or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 20.0% against 19.9% in Mauritius as of 2004.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between Mauritius and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.1%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Papua New Guinea?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2004.
- How do Mauritius and Papua New Guinea rank globally for gross capital formation?
- Mauritius ranks 131st and Papua New Guinea ranks 130th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.