Kiribati vs Low income: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- Kiribati
- Low income
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 29.9% against 20.7% in Low income, a difference of 9.2%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.4 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Low income ahead.
Kiribati ranks 38th and Low income ranks 39th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Low income in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.8% | 18.2% | 2.3% | Low income |
| 2010s | 25.3% | 22.1% | 3.2% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 22.1% | 22.3% | 0.2% | Low income |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, Kiribati or Low income?
- Kiribati, at 29.9% against 20.7% in Low income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between Kiribati and Low income?
- 9.2%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Low income?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Low income rank globally for gross capital formation?
- Kiribati ranks 38th and Low income ranks 39th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.