IDA only vs Uzbekistan: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- IDA only
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 33.3% against 25.6% in IDA only, a difference of 7.7%.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.3 times IDA only's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
IDA only ranks 20th and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 43 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA only | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20.5% | 22.6% | 2.1% | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 23.2% | 25.5% | 2.3% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 26.9% | 27.5% | 0.7% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 27.6% | 35.0% | 7.4% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, IDA only or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 33.3% against 25.6% in IDA only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between IDA only and Uzbekistan?
- 7.7%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Uzbekistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do IDA only and Uzbekistan rank globally for gross capital formation?
- IDA only ranks 20th and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.