China vs Suriname: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- China
- Suriname
How they compare
China currently reports 40.5% against 36.2% in Suriname, a difference of 4.3%.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Suriname ahead.
China ranks 8th and Suriname ranks 11th of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.7% | 45.2% | 3.5% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 46.1% | 36.2% | 9.9% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, China or Suriname?
- China, at 40.5% against 36.2% in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between China and Suriname?
- 4.3%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do China and Suriname rank globally for gross capital formation?
- China ranks 8th and Suriname ranks 11th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.