Latvia vs Nepal: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- Latvia
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 13.38 billion current US$ against 11.70 billion current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 1.68 billion current US$.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Nepal ahead.
Latvia ranks 88th and Nepal ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.37 billion current US$ | 1.16 billion current US$ | 208.03 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 6.11 billion current US$ | 2.25 billion current US$ | 3.86 billion current US$ | Latvia |
| 2010s | 6.92 billion current US$ | 8.46 billion current US$ | 1.53 billion current US$ | Nepal |
| 2020s | 9.72 billion current US$ | 12.87 billion current US$ | 3.15 billion current US$ | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, Latvia or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 13.38 billion current US$ against 11.70 billion current US$ in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between Latvia and Nepal?
- 1.68 billion current US$, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nepal?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Nepal rank globally for gross capital formation?
- Latvia ranks 88th and Nepal ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.