Low & middle income vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP

Low & middle income
0.3319 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.4068 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Low & middle income rank
9th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
7th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.10.20.30.4196019922025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.4068 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.3319 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income, a difference of 0.0749 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Low & middle income ahead.

Low & middle income ranks 9th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 43 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low & middle income averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2531 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1637 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0894 current US$ per US$ of GDP Low & middle income
2000s 0.2807 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2613 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0194 current US$ per US$ of GDP Low & middle income
2010s 0.335 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3521 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0171 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.3397 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0605 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per unit of gdp, Low & middle income or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.4068 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.3319 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per unit of gdp between Low & middle income and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0749 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Tanzania, United Republic of?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Low & middle income and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Low & middle income ranks 9th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/low-and-middle-income/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/low-and-middle-income/tanzania/">Low & middle income vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 10,917 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.