Early-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP

Early-demographic dividend
0.2787 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
0.3413 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
15th
Rwanda rank
18th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Rwanda
0.20.30.40.5196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.3413 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2787 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0626 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2044 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2292 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0248 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1970s 0.2466 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.342 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0954 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 0.2398 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4486 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2088 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1990s 0.2343 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4079 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1736 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 0.2506 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2979 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0472 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0.2759 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2282 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0477 current US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
2020s 0.2763 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.332 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0557 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per unit of gdp, Early-demographic dividend or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.3413 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2787 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per unit of gdp between Early-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
0.0626 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Rwanda rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/rwanda/">Early-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 10,917 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.