Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong, China: Gross capital formation (current US$), per capita

Early-demographic dividend
1,273 current US$ per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
10,456 current US$ per person
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
28th
Hong Kong, China rank
29th

Gross capital formation (current US$), per capita over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Hong Kong, China
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k196019922025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 10,456 current US$ per person against 1,273 current US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 9,183 current US$ per person.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 8.2 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 28th and Hong Kong, China ranks 29th of 43 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1960s 37.89 current US$ per person 160.43 current US$ per person 122.54 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1970s 112.87 current US$ per person 650.97 current US$ per person 538.1 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1980s 203.26 current US$ per person 2,072 current US$ per person 1,869 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1990s 263.84 current US$ per person 6,456 current US$ per person 6,192 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2000s 462.92 current US$ per person 6,198 current US$ per person 5,735 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 911.69 current US$ per person 9,256 current US$ per person 8,345 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 1,113 current US$ per person 8,646 current US$ per person 7,533 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current us$), per capita, Early-demographic dividend or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 10,456 current US$ per person against 1,273 current US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current us$), per capita between Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China?
9,183 current US$ per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gross capital formation (current us$), per capita?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 28th and Hong Kong, China ranks 29th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong, China: Gross capital formation (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/hong-kong-sar-china/">Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong, China: Gross capital formation (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 10,947 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.