Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Suriname
27,052 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2010
Zimbabwe
17,504 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
178th
Zimbabwe rank
181st

Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Suriname
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 27,052 current LCU per square kilometre against 17,504 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 9,548 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Suriname ranks 178th and Zimbabwe ranks 181st of 184 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 25,315 current LCU per square kilometre 0.4966 current LCU per square kilometre 25,314 current LCU per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 27,052 current LCU per square kilometre 2.34 current LCU per square kilometre 27,049 current LCU per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Suriname or Zimbabwe?
Suriname, at 27,052 current LCU per square kilometre against 17,504 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2010.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
9,548 current LCU per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Suriname ranks 178th and Zimbabwe ranks 181st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/">Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.