Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Libya
20,329 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
17,504 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
179th
Zimbabwe rank
181st

Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Libya
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 20,329 current LCU per square kilometre against 17,504 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2,825 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 179th and Zimbabwe ranks 181st of 184 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 855.31 current LCU per square kilometre 1.5 current LCU per square kilometre 853.81 current LCU per square kilometre Libya
2000s 5,758 current LCU per square kilometre 0.4809 current LCU per square kilometre 5,758 current LCU per square kilometre Libya
2010s 8,232 current LCU per square kilometre 5.66 current LCU per square kilometre 8,226 current LCU per square kilometre Libya
2020s 11,814 current LCU per square kilometre 4,899 current LCU per square kilometre 6,915 current LCU per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Libya or Zimbabwe?
Libya, at 20,329 current LCU per square kilometre against 17,504 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Libya and Zimbabwe?
2,825 current LCU per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Libya and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Libya ranks 179th and Zimbabwe ranks 181st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/">Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.