Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Singapore: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Lao People's Democratic Republic
162.48 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2016
Singapore
202.01 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
18th
Singapore rank
15th

Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Singapore
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 202.01 million current LCU per square kilometre against 162.48 million current LCU per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 39.52 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.2 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Singapore ahead.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 18th and Singapore ranks 15th of 184 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 64,211 current LCU per square kilometre 25.62 million current LCU per square kilometre 25.55 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 38.33 million current LCU per square kilometre 78.36 million current LCU per square kilometre 40.02 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 122.25 million current LCU per square kilometre 151.40 million current LCU per square kilometre 29.14 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Singapore?
Singapore, at 202.01 million current LCU per square kilometre against 162.48 million current LCU per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Singapore?
39.52 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Singapore?
22 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2016.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Singapore rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 18th and Singapore ranks 15th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Singapore: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/singapore/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Singapore: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.