Hong Kong, China vs Rwanda: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Hong Kong, China
458.58 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
267.11 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
9th
Rwanda rank
11th
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Rwanda
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 458.58 million current LCU per square kilometre against 267.11 million current LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 191.47 million current LCU per square kilometre.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.7 times Rwanda's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 9th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 184 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | 99,488 current LCU per square kilometre | 3.16 million current LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1970s | 14.69 million current LCU per square kilometre | 743,336 current LCU per square kilometre | 13.94 million current LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1980s | 81.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | 2.82 million current LCU per square kilometre | 78.44 million current LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 302.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.33 million current LCU per square kilometre | 296.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 313.28 million current LCU per square kilometre | 18.25 million current LCU per square kilometre | 295.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 498.84 million current LCU per square kilometre | 56.22 million current LCU per square kilometre | 442.61 million current LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 451.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | 179.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | 272.13 million current LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or Rwanda?
- Hong Kong, China, at 458.58 million current LCU per square kilometre against 267.11 million current LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and Rwanda?
- 191.47 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Rwanda rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 9th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.