Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Greenland
20,099 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
17,504 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
180th
Zimbabwe rank
181st

Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Greenland
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 20,099 current LCU per square kilometre against 17,504 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2,595 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Greenland's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.

Greenland ranks 180th and Zimbabwe ranks 181st of 184 countries.

Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 7,816 current LCU per square kilometre 0.4032 current LCU per square kilometre 7,816 current LCU per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 13,115 current LCU per square kilometre 5.66 current LCU per square kilometre 13,109 current LCU per square kilometre Greenland
2020s 18,911 current LCU per square kilometre 4,899 current LCU per square kilometre 14,012 current LCU per square kilometre Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Greenland or Zimbabwe?
Greenland, at 20,099 current LCU per square kilometre against 17,504 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Greenland and Zimbabwe?
2,595 current LCU per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zimbabwe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Greenland ranks 180th and Zimbabwe ranks 181st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/">Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.