Ecuador vs Kiribati: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
100,815 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
134,107 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
165th
Kiribati rank
162nd

Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Kiribati
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 134,107 current LCU per square kilometre against 100,815 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 33,292 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 165th and Kiribati ranks 162nd of 184 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 43,605 current LCU per square kilometre 32,467 current LCU per square kilometre 11,138 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 87,124 current LCU per square kilometre 76,223 current LCU per square kilometre 10,901 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 90,749 current LCU per square kilometre 97,010 current LCU per square kilometre 6,261 current LCU per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 134,107 current LCU per square kilometre against 100,815 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Kiribati?
33,292 current LCU per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Kiribati rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 165th and Kiribati ranks 162nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Kiribati: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/kiribati/">Ecuador vs Kiribati: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.