Chile vs Sri Lanka: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
88.61 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
108.06 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
25th
Sri Lanka rank
23rd

Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Sri Lanka
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 108.06 million current LCU per square kilometre against 88.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 19.45 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Chile ranks 25th and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 5.71 current LCU per square kilometre 21,574 current LCU per square kilometre 21,569 current LCU per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 43,018 current LCU per square kilometre 80,153 current LCU per square kilometre 37,135 current LCU per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 952,853 current LCU per square kilometre 611,977 current LCU per square kilometre 340,876 current LCU per square kilometre Chile
1990s 9.37 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.67 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.69 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2000s 21.68 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.78 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2010s 58.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 82.81 million current LCU per square kilometre 24.65 million current LCU per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 78.71 million current LCU per square kilometre 100.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 21.76 million current LCU per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 108.06 million current LCU per square kilometre against 88.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Sri Lanka?
19.45 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sri Lanka?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sri Lanka rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 25th and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sri Lanka: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/">Chile vs Sri Lanka: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.