Cameroon vs Nepal: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Cameroon
12.08 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
11.66 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
59th
Nepal rank
61st

Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cameroon
  • Nepal
05.0M10.0M15.0M196519942023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 12.08 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.66 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 417,500 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 59th and Nepal ranks 61st of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 63,379 current LCU per square kilometre 2,531 current LCU per square kilometre 60,848 current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
1970s 321,381 current LCU per square kilometre 13,243 current LCU per square kilometre 308,138 current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
1980s 1.52 million current LCU per square kilometre 69,962 current LCU per square kilometre 1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 1.82 million current LCU per square kilometre 348,641 current LCU per square kilometre 1.47 million current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
2000s 3.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.86 million current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 7.38 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.77 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.61 million current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 10.40 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.92 million current LCU per square kilometre 516,175 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Cameroon or Nepal?
Cameroon, at 12.08 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.66 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Cameroon and Nepal?
417,500 current LCU per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Nepal?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Nepal rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Cameroon ranks 59th and Nepal ranks 61st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Nepal: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/nepal/">Cameroon vs Nepal: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.