Cameroon vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Cameroon
12.08 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
11.73 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
59th
Guinea-Bissau rank
60th

Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cameroon
  • Guinea-Bissau
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196519942023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 12.08 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.73 million current LCU per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 348,100 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 59th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 5 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1970s 321,381 current LCU per square kilometre 1,215 current LCU per square kilometre 320,166 current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
1980s 1.52 million current LCU per square kilometre 42,330 current LCU per square kilometre 1.47 million current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 1.82 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 369,627 current LCU per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 3.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.52 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.47 million current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 7.38 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.49 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.89 million current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 10.40 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.46 million current LCU per square kilometre 941,585 current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Cameroon or Guinea-Bissau?
Cameroon, at 12.08 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.73 million current LCU per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Cameroon and Guinea-Bissau?
348,100 current LCU per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Guinea-Bissau?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Cameroon ranks 59th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/guinea-bissau/">Cameroon vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.