Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
9.03 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
11.03 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
64th
Iceland rank
62nd

Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Iceland
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 11.03 million current LCU per square kilometre against 9.03 million current LCU per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 1.99 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 64th and Iceland ranks 62nd of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 150,349 current LCU per square kilometre 9,531 current LCU per square kilometre 140,818 current LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1980s 432,620 current LCU per square kilometre 303,659 current LCU per square kilometre 128,960 current LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1990s 1.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.02 million current LCU per square kilometre 17,023 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 1.97 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 818,085 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 5.61 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.26 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.35 million current LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 7.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.57 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.25 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Iceland?
Iceland, at 11.03 million current LCU per square kilometre against 9.03 million current LCU per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Iceland?
1.99 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Iceland rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 64th and Iceland ranks 62nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/iceland/">Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.