Botswana vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
140,388 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
156,983 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
161st
Latvia rank
159th

Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Latvia
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 156,983 current LCU per square kilometre against 140,388 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 16,595 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 161st and Latvia ranks 159th of 184 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 9,148 current LCU per square kilometre 17,819 current LCU per square kilometre 8,671 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 25,248 current LCU per square kilometre 74,658 current LCU per square kilometre 49,410 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 68,946 current LCU per square kilometre 91,026 current LCU per square kilometre 22,080 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 114,640 current LCU per square kilometre 134,386 current LCU per square kilometre 19,746 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Latvia?
Latvia, at 156,983 current LCU per square kilometre against 140,388 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Latvia?
16,595 current LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Latvia rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 161st and Latvia ranks 159th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/latvia/">Botswana vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.