Aruba vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Aruba
6.85 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
6.25 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
70th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
73rd

Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Trinidad and Tobago
2.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M199520092023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 6.85 million current LCU per square kilometre against 6.25 million current LCU per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 593,480 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 70th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 73rd of 184 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 6.80 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.61 million current LCU per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 6.67 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 323,848 current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 6.26 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 62,312 current LCU per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Aruba or Trinidad and Tobago?
Aruba, at 6.85 million current LCU per square kilometre against 6.25 million current LCU per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Aruba and Trinidad and Tobago?
593,480 current LCU per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Trinidad and Tobago?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 70th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 73rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/trinidad-and-tobago/">Aruba vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.