Aruba vs Congo: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Aruba
6.85 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
6.86 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
70th
Congo rank
69th
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time
- Aruba
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 6.86 million current LCU per square kilometre against 6.85 million current LCU per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 12,420 current LCU per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 70th and Congo ranks 69th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.63 million current LCU per square kilometre | 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2000s | 6.80 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.51 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.30 million current LCU per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2010s | 6.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10.70 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2020s | 6.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | 5.70 million current LCU per square kilometre | 556,158 current LCU per square kilometre | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Aruba or Congo?
- Congo, at 6.86 million current LCU per square kilometre against 6.85 million current LCU per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Aruba and Congo?
- 12,420 current LCU per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Congo?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Congo rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Aruba ranks 70th and Congo ranks 69th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.