Eritrea vs Jordan: Gross capital formation (current LCU), per capita
Eritrea
1,337 current LCU per person
in 2011
Jordan
537.83 current LCU per person
in 2007
Eritrea rank
179th
Jordan rank
182nd
Gross capital formation (current LCU), per capita over time
- Eritrea
- Jordan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1,337 current LCU per person against 537.83 current LCU per person in Jordan, a difference of 799.17 current LCU per person.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 2.5 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Jordan ahead.
Eritrea ranks 179th and Jordan ranks 182nd of 187 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 552.32 current LCU per person | 288.2 current LCU per person | 264.12 current LCU per person | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1,108 current LCU per person | 361.11 current LCU per person | 747.25 current LCU per person | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation (current lcu), per capita, Eritrea or Jordan?
- Eritrea, at 1,337 current LCU per person against 537.83 current LCU per person in Jordan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation (current lcu), per capita between Eritrea and Jordan?
- 799.17 current LCU per person, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Jordan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2007.
- How do Eritrea and Jordan rank globally for gross capital formation (current lcu), per capita?
- Eritrea ranks 179th and Jordan ranks 182nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.