Latvia vs Puerto Rico: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- Latvia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 8.72 billion constant LCU against 8.53 billion constant LCU in Latvia, a difference of 187.69 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Latvia ranks 135th and Puerto Rico ranks 133rd of 170 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.07 billion constant LCU | 17.27 billion constant LCU | 15.19 billion constant LCU | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 5.85 billion constant LCU | 20.91 billion constant LCU | 15.06 billion constant LCU | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 5.64 billion constant LCU | 12.87 billion constant LCU | 7.23 billion constant LCU | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 7.56 billion constant LCU | 8.02 billion constant LCU | 466.36 million constant LCU | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, Latvia or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 8.72 billion constant LCU against 8.53 billion constant LCU in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between Latvia and Puerto Rico?
- 187.69 million constant LCU, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Puerto Rico?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Puerto Rico rank globally for gross capital formation?
- Latvia ranks 135th and Puerto Rico ranks 133rd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.