Latvia vs Lesotho: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- Latvia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 8.75 billion constant LCU against 8.53 billion constant LCU in Latvia, a difference of 221.99 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lesotho ahead.
Latvia ranks 135th and Lesotho ranks 132nd of 169 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.07 billion constant LCU | 3.19 billion constant LCU | 1.12 billion constant LCU | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 5.85 billion constant LCU | 3.30 billion constant LCU | 2.56 billion constant LCU | Latvia |
| 2010s | 5.64 billion constant LCU | 6.49 billion constant LCU | 856.16 million constant LCU | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 7.56 billion constant LCU | 7.53 billion constant LCU | 29.46 million constant LCU | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, Latvia or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 8.75 billion constant LCU against 8.53 billion constant LCU in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between Latvia and Lesotho?
- 221.99 million constant LCU, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lesotho?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Lesotho rank globally for gross capital formation?
- Latvia ranks 135th and Lesotho ranks 132nd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.