Guatemala vs Lebanon: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- Guatemala
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 123.03 billion constant LCU against 112.33 billion constant LCU in Guatemala, a difference of 10.70 billion constant LCU.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 92nd and Lebanon ranks 90th of 169 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41.74 billion constant LCU | 6.63 trillion constant LCU | 6.59 trillion constant LCU | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 64.38 billion constant LCU | 8.48 trillion constant LCU | 8.42 trillion constant LCU | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 65.99 billion constant LCU | 15.43 trillion constant LCU | 15.36 trillion constant LCU | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 90.02 billion constant LCU | 1.81 trillion constant LCU | 1.72 trillion constant LCU | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, Guatemala or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 123.03 billion constant LCU against 112.33 billion constant LCU in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between Guatemala and Lebanon?
- 10.70 billion constant LCU, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lebanon?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Lebanon rank globally for gross capital formation?
- Guatemala ranks 92nd and Lebanon ranks 90th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.