Ecuador vs Panama: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- Ecuador
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 27.52 billion constant LCU against 22.28 billion constant LCU in Ecuador, a difference of 5.24 billion constant LCU.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 116th and Panama ranks 115th of 169 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.24 billion constant LCU | 4.84 billion constant LCU | 5.40 billion constant LCU | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 9.88 billion constant LCU | 7.53 billion constant LCU | 2.35 billion constant LCU | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 21.01 billion constant LCU | 22.79 billion constant LCU | 1.78 billion constant LCU | Panama |
| 2020s | 20.64 billion constant LCU | 23.35 billion constant LCU | 2.71 billion constant LCU | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, Ecuador or Panama?
- Panama, at 27.52 billion constant LCU against 22.28 billion constant LCU in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between Ecuador and Panama?
- 5.24 billion constant LCU, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Panama?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Panama rank globally for gross capital formation?
- Ecuador ranks 116th and Panama ranks 115th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.