Congo vs Serbia: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- Congo
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 2.01 trillion constant LCU against 1.47 trillion constant LCU in Congo, a difference of 544.92 billion constant LCU.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 45th of 169 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 675.69 billion constant LCU | 353.70 billion constant LCU | 321.99 billion constant LCU | Congo |
| 2000s | 1.09 trillion constant LCU | 757.50 billion constant LCU | 335.65 billion constant LCU | Congo |
| 2010s | 2.30 trillion constant LCU | 1.02 trillion constant LCU | 1.28 trillion constant LCU | Congo |
| 2020s | 1.25 trillion constant LCU | 1.76 trillion constant LCU | 508.57 billion constant LCU | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, Congo or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 2.01 trillion constant LCU against 1.47 trillion constant LCU in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between Congo and Serbia?
- 544.92 billion constant LCU, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Serbia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Serbia rank globally for gross capital formation?
- Congo ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 45th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.