Belarus vs Finland: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- Belarus
- Finland
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 57.67 billion constant LCU against 52.75 billion constant LCU in Finland, a difference of 4.92 billion constant LCU.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.
Belarus ranks 104th and Finland ranks 106th of 169 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.91 billion constant LCU | 33.99 billion constant LCU | 16.08 billion constant LCU | Finland |
| 2000s | 30.07 billion constant LCU | 50.52 billion constant LCU | 20.45 billion constant LCU | Finland |
| 2010s | 58.52 billion constant LCU | 54.97 billion constant LCU | 3.55 billion constant LCU | Belarus |
| 2020s | 50.62 billion constant LCU | 57.57 billion constant LCU | 6.95 billion constant LCU | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, Belarus or Finland?
- Belarus, at 57.67 billion constant LCU against 52.75 billion constant LCU in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between Belarus and Finland?
- 4.92 billion constant LCU, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Finland?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Finland rank globally for gross capital formation?
- Belarus ranks 104th and Finland ranks 106th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.