Austria vs Bhutan: Gross capital formation
Gross capital formation over time
- Austria
- Bhutan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 94.68 billion constant LCU against 94.52 billion constant LCU in Austria, a difference of 157.80 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 97th and Bhutan ranks 96th of 169 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69.46 billion constant LCU | 15.16 billion constant LCU | 54.30 billion constant LCU | Austria |
| 2000s | 81.83 billion constant LCU | 39.67 billion constant LCU | 42.16 billion constant LCU | Austria |
| 2010s | 91.67 billion constant LCU | 84.72 billion constant LCU | 6.95 billion constant LCU | Austria |
| 2020s | 102.82 billion constant LCU | 86.42 billion constant LCU | 16.40 billion constant LCU | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, Austria or Bhutan?
- Bhutan, at 94.68 billion constant LCU against 94.52 billion constant LCU in Austria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between Austria and Bhutan?
- 157.80 million constant LCU, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Bhutan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Bhutan rank globally for gross capital formation?
- Austria ranks 97th and Bhutan ranks 96th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.