East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

East Timor
27,668 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
17,504 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor rank
156th
Zimbabwe rank
158th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • East Timor
  • Zimbabwe
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k200020112023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 27,668 constant LCU per square kilometre against 17,504 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 10,164 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.6 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

East Timor ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 166 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Timor Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 31,578 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,731 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,848 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 41,815 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,425 constant LCU per square kilometre 32,390 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 27,084 constant LCU per square kilometre 15,139 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,945 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, East Timor or Zimbabwe?
East Timor, at 27,668 constant LCU per square kilometre against 17,504 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between East Timor and Zimbabwe?
10,164 constant LCU per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do East Timor and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
East Timor ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/">East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.