Serbia vs Togo: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Serbia
21.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo
22.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia rank
35th
Togo rank
32nd

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Serbia
  • Togo
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M196519942023

How they compare

Togo currently reports 22.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 21.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 1.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 35th and Togo ranks 32nd of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Togo Difference Ahead
2000s 11.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 11.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 19.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre 20.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre 843,100 constant LCU per square kilometre Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Serbia or Togo?
Togo, at 22.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 21.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Serbia and Togo?
1.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Togo?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Togo rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Serbia ranks 35th and Togo ranks 32nd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Togo: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/serbia/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/serbia/togo/">Serbia vs Togo: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.