Nicaragua vs Panama: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Nicaragua
412,013 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
399,551 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
113th
Panama rank
115th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Panama
0200.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 412,013 constant LCU per square kilometre against 399,551 constant LCU per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 12,462 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 113th and Panama ranks 115th of 166 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 252,294 constant LCU per square kilometre 65,063 constant LCU per square kilometre 187,230 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 272,085 constant LCU per square kilometre 101,351 constant LCU per square kilometre 170,734 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 390,278 constant LCU per square kilometre 307,172 constant LCU per square kilometre 83,106 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 364,152 constant LCU per square kilometre 300,753 constant LCU per square kilometre 63,400 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Nicaragua or Panama?
Nicaragua, at 412,013 constant LCU per square kilometre against 399,551 constant LCU per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Nicaragua and Panama?
12,462 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Panama?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Panama rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Nicaragua ranks 113th and Panama ranks 115th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Panama: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/panama/">Nicaragua vs Panama: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.